Commentary for Bava Kamma 40:5
תנן המקיף חבירו משלש רוחותיו וגדר את הראשונה ואת השניה ואת השלישית אין מחייבין אותו הא רביעית מחייבין אותו
Should, however, the plaintiff make a fence also on the fourth side, the defendant would [no doubt] have to share the whole outlay of the fences. Now, could it not he deduced from this that wherever a defendant has derived benefit, though the plaintiff has thereby sustained no loss,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Such as in the case before us where the fences were of course erected primarily for the plaintiff's own use. ');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 40:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.